2 results
Differences in Device-Associated Infections Rates in Argentina
- Wanda Cornistein, Griselda Almada, Andrea Novau, Viviana Rodriguez, Cristina Freuler, Maria Ines Staneloni
-
- Journal:
- Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology / Volume 41 / Issue S1 / October 2020
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 02 November 2020, p. s469
- Print publication:
- October 2020
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Background: Infection control programs (ICPs) are essential to reducing, in a progressive and sustained manner, healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). To achieve this goal these programs need not only resources (ie, trained human resources and financial resources) but also institutional leadership support. In our country, epidemiological surveillance is voluntary and is registered in the Argentina National Hospital Infection Surveillance System (VIHDA) where 114 hospitals and 78 adult intensive care unit (ICU) report their HAI rates. Many of these institutions do not have IPC or specific resources for this purpose. On the other hand, there are institutions with IPC, recognized by an international accreditation like Joint Commission International, that carry out an advanced and continuous program, with specific improvement goals for prevention and infection control. There is an imperative need in low- and middle-income countries to highlight the impact of ICPs in this setting and to promote regulations for mandatory surveillance and ICPs in all acute-care hospitals. Objective: To compare the rates for device-associated infections in ICUs of institutions with advanced ICPs versus national rates. Design: We conducted an observational, retrospective study, which includes device associated infection rates in adult critical care units from 2014 to 2018. We included all ICUs reporting to VIHDA and 3 surgical-medical teaching hospitals with an advanced ICP and Joint Commission International accreditation (Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Hospital Universitario Austral, Hospital Aleman). The VIHDA definition was used to define central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), catheter-related urinary infection (CAUTI), and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). The rates were compared as adjusted reasons for exposure time using openepi.com software provided by the CDC. Results: Device associated infection rates in hospitals with advanced ICPs and in hospitals in the national surveillance system in Argentina are shown in Table 1. Compliance with infection control measures and bundles for device-associated infections in the 3 hospitals with advanced ICPs was >80%. No data were available for the rest of hospitals included the national surveillance system. Conclusions: Lower infection-control rates, catheter-related bloodstream infection and VAP, are possible in a middle-income country like Argentina when resources are allocated for this purpose and hospital leadership reinforces the efforts. Notably, all 3 hospitals improved their rates over time. The differences in catheter-related bloodstream infection and VAP rates between these hospitals and the rest of the hospitals in our surveillance system was significant and highlights the need for support when it comes to implementing ICPs.
Funding: None
Disclosures: Wanda Cornistein reports fees for conferences not related to this topic from the following speaker’s bureaus: Pfizer, Merck, and Becton Dickinson.
Gap Analysis of Infection Control Practices in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
- Kristy Weinshel, Angela Dramowski, Ágnes Hajdu, Saul Jacob, Basudha Khanal, Maszárovics Zoltán, Katerina Mougkou, Chimanjita Phukan, Maria Inés Staneloni, Nalini Singh
-
- Journal:
- Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology / Volume 36 / Issue 10 / October 2015
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 22 July 2015, pp. 1208-1214
- Print publication:
- October 2015
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
BACKGROUND
Healthcare-associated infection rates are higher in low- and middle-income countries compared with high-income countries, resulting in relatively larger incidence of patient mortality and disability and additional healthcare costs.
OBJECTIVETo use the Infection Control Assessment Tool to assess gaps in infection control (IC) practices in the participating countries.
METHODSSix international sites located in Argentina, Greece, Hungary, India, Nepal, and South Africa provided information on the health facility and the surgical modules relating to IC programs, surgical antibiotic use and surgical equipment procedures, surgical area practices, sterilization and disinfection of equipment and intravenous fluid, and hand hygiene. Modules were scored for each country.
RESULTSThe 6 international sites completed 5 modules. Of 121 completed sections, scores of less than 50% of the recommended IC practices were received in 23 (19%) and scores from 50% to 75% were received in 43 (36%). IC programs had various limitations in many sites and surveillance of healthcare-associated infections was not consistently performed. Lack of administration of perioperative antibiotics, inadequate sterilization and disinfection of equipment, and paucity of hand hygiene were found even in a high-income country. There was also a lack of clearly written defined policies and procedures across many facilities.
CONCLUSIONSOur results indicate that adherence to recommended IC practices is suboptimal. Opportunities for improvement of IC practices exist in several areas, including hospital-wide IC programs and surveillance, antibiotic stewardship, written and posted guidelines and policies across a range of topics, surgical instrument sterilization procedures, and improved hand hygiene.
Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2015;36(10):1208–1214